1) Q. What question does Erik pose to the audience?  

2) Q. What was Erik’s first real passion?  

3) Q. What conception of photography did Erik previously hold?  

4) Q. How did this inspire him?  

5) Q. What “common goal” do Erik’s photos have?   

6) Q. Define realism as used in this context.   

7) Q. What principles does he adhere to when creating an image?   

8) Q. Why is it easier to create a place rather than to find a place?   

9) Q. How does he plan the photos?   

10) Q. What is his conclusion?   

1. Erik asked if his compositing was considered as photography.
2. Erik's first passion was for drawing.
3. Erik thought that the process ended once you pressed the camera.
4. He wanted to create something where the process just began when you took the picture.
5. Erik wants his composites to have contrasting features, but also to have a sense of realism in all of them.
6. Pictures that look like they still could have been captured somehow.
7. Erik follows the principles of using photos taken from the same perspective, photos combined should have the same type of light, and to make the combined photos impossible to distinguish where the certain photos begin and end.
8. It is easier to create a place rather than to find a place because then you do not have to compromise with the ideas in your head.
9. First Erik creates a sketch or idea, then finds all of the locations and pictures and begins.
10. Erik concluded with a theory that the only thing that limits us is our imagination.